Editorial Policy

Key facts, charts, and tables present verifiable data with sources. Sections containing interpretation say so in the text. If a claim can’t be traced to a stated source or method, it doesn’t ship.

Every briefing carries a methodology section, source list, data-refresh timestamp, and a “what changed” log. When the data refresh materially weakens a thesis, the thesis is updated — not quietly, but in the change log. Pipeline details: Data Methodology.

Factual errors are corrected in place with a dated note in the article’s change log. We do not silently edit substantive claims.

Advertisers have no influence over coverage; see the Advertising Disclosure. The Narraitive does not accept payment for coverage, and any position an author holds in a discussed security would be disclosed in the article.

The Narraitive is AI-assisted by design and says so on every page: automated pipelines refresh data, regenerate charts, and synthesize summaries (the “AI Pulse”). Editorial judgment — the thesis, the interpretation, what gets published — carries human accountability. Three hard rules: every briefing lists its data sources; figures that are modeled or illustrative are labeled as such in the methodology section; and nothing is published about a person or company that is not either attributed to a stated source or clearly framed as opinion. We do not publish unsourced factual claims.